I suppose the question is if the American people are likely to elect an omnivourous woman or a vegetarian man first, with all other factors being as equal as plausible.
omnivorous woman. i'm not saying this because i think on an individual basis omnivorous women are more electable, but just because omnivorous women are a much larger population (probably by about an order of magnitude).
Good point. Although of course with that line of thinking, we should consider that we elected a biracial/African American identified man before a Caucasian woman. The percentages in the US are 2.4, 12.4 and 32%, respectively (wikipedia/census data) A 1994 Roper poll suggests about 3.5% of males and 4% of females do not eat meat.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
6/11/10 00:21 (UTC)In my lifetime? Possibly.
I suppose the question is if the American people are likely to elect an omnivourous woman or a vegetarian man first, with all other factors being as equal as plausible.
(no subject)
6/11/10 19:39 (UTC)(no subject)
6/11/10 20:05 (UTC)