(no subject)

29/12/08 18:31 (UTC)
the critic should criticize the art, not just the artist.

This is a really good point, and I agree! And I also agree that I would like to see the actual film before making a clear judgment on it.

It raises a question, though, which is: in order for me to see the work in order to decide whether or not I support it, I need to support it by seeing it. The reason [livejournal.com profile] eredien started this conversation is that she has no access to the film unless she brings it to a local theater, to be seen by many other people. Which, if it turns out to be exploitative, would be a mistake. But she can't know whether or not it is exploitative until she forks over the money to the creator to see it. And there's enough debate among the critics, as seen above, that she can't just trust their judgment.

So what to do?
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516 171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page generated 17/6/25 09:43

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags