And the Thunderclap
19/8/10 15:50I have absolutely no ability to schedule things I do for other people into my larger schedule of "things I do for myself."
And since doing things for other people is often (to varying extents) beneficial to me, I tended to veer toward benefiting the greater number of people, rather than doing the action that would most benefit me and others, at any given time. But this tendency to always give top priority to and take immediate action on only the things that benefited me and others, rather than being able to schedule "things solely for me" and "things solely for others" and "things that benefit me and others," was not helpful.
I think I was again starting to believe it was ok to do things solely for my own benefit, and was even starting to do some of those things--but then in turn had problems scheduling "the things I do solely for myself" into a greater schedule of "things I do for myself."
When I am only by myself, all "the things I do solely for myself" always line up with the larger list of "the things I need to do for myself," so there is no tension and no time-management problem.
Hm. Hm hm hm.
Thought-provoking.
On one hand, this looks like a scheduling problem, which should not be that hard to tackle in the first place. I can now look at my tasks and say, "does this solely benefit me?" "does this benefit me and others?" "does this just benefit others?" and then decide to prioritize based on my circumstances and feelings. If I feel like I need more time alone, I can choose to prioritize actions that solely benefit me. If I feel like I need less time alone, I can choose to prioritize actions that benefit me and others, or just others. If there is a task to be done regardless of how I feel that day, I can monitor my emotions and ask for more time for myself or get more time with others later.
On the other hand, I am not good at determining how long any given action is going to take. If I want to do an action that benefits me and others (baking bread, for example, lets me be creative (benefit to me) and lets me feed me and other people delicious food (benefit to me and others)). If I am feeling like I want to do a little action for myself and others and then a great deal of action only for myself, and bread baking takes an hour instead of 20 minutes, and then the action for myself, designing something say, takes four times as long as I thought it would, I will become grumpy due to a problem with understanding estimated time and time-frames for any given action.
Hm.
I think I need to think more about this.
I think it should be solvable.
--
The medication for thrush says it is "cherry mint" flavor, but I think it tastes like banana mixed with wedding mints.
And since doing things for other people is often (to varying extents) beneficial to me, I tended to veer toward benefiting the greater number of people, rather than doing the action that would most benefit me and others, at any given time. But this tendency to always give top priority to and take immediate action on only the things that benefited me and others, rather than being able to schedule "things solely for me" and "things solely for others" and "things that benefit me and others," was not helpful.
I think I was again starting to believe it was ok to do things solely for my own benefit, and was even starting to do some of those things--but then in turn had problems scheduling "the things I do solely for myself" into a greater schedule of "things I do for myself."
When I am only by myself, all "the things I do solely for myself" always line up with the larger list of "the things I need to do for myself," so there is no tension and no time-management problem.
Hm. Hm hm hm.
Thought-provoking.
On one hand, this looks like a scheduling problem, which should not be that hard to tackle in the first place. I can now look at my tasks and say, "does this solely benefit me?" "does this benefit me and others?" "does this just benefit others?" and then decide to prioritize based on my circumstances and feelings. If I feel like I need more time alone, I can choose to prioritize actions that solely benefit me. If I feel like I need less time alone, I can choose to prioritize actions that benefit me and others, or just others. If there is a task to be done regardless of how I feel that day, I can monitor my emotions and ask for more time for myself or get more time with others later.
On the other hand, I am not good at determining how long any given action is going to take. If I want to do an action that benefits me and others (baking bread, for example, lets me be creative (benefit to me) and lets me feed me and other people delicious food (benefit to me and others)). If I am feeling like I want to do a little action for myself and others and then a great deal of action only for myself, and bread baking takes an hour instead of 20 minutes, and then the action for myself, designing something say, takes four times as long as I thought it would, I will become grumpy due to a problem with understanding estimated time and time-frames for any given action.
Hm.
I think I need to think more about this.
I think it should be solvable.
--
The medication for thrush says it is "cherry mint" flavor, but I think it tastes like banana mixed with wedding mints.
Tags: