As the article says, they're an evangelical Christian organization. I would have been the more surprised if the Western Region or whatever had been permitted to go ahead with extending benefits to unmarried partners. And if they had, wouldn't you consider them to be compromising their beliefs/principles? (Setting aside the fact that you disagree with those beliefs/principles.)
I dunno - it sounds like a disagreement between the national org and the regional chapters.
Look on the bright side and be proud that at least someone thought it was a good idea. Honestly, how many companies extend benefits to unmarried partners?
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2008-11-21 02:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Look on the bright side and be proud that at least someone thought it was a good idea. Honestly, how many companies extend benefits to unmarried partners?
(no subject)
(no subject)